Tuesday, January 06, 2009

The Black Magicians of Monsanto

Far too many British Spiritualists are concerned with topics as trivial as the so-called “Randi Gamble.” Indeed, following the work of Carl Gustav Jung and Roberto Assagioli, it is almost beyond me that our religious ministers waist so much of their valuable time addressing the clod-like assertions of a clearly career based scepticism, when spirits are now openly at war around us. Certainly, some members of the younger generation have sensed that a call-to-arms has been sounded. They seem to perceive dark, destructive forces remaining dangerously unchallenged in our society and quite justifiably are starting to accuse their more mature neighbours of a bewildering spiritual narcolepsy. Many of them even feel that these devious shades are threatening the fecund environment; gathering a hellish, technocratic, momentum, against our Mother the Earth. All of which makes it truly astonishing that - as a movement - we have done so little to support their spiritual concerns. Perhaps especially so, once we recall how few other Churches uphold the sanctity of Life, on every level, as intrinsically worthy of respect.

In fairness, a number of factors hide these mighty battles from general view. Most notably the fact that their outward form is usually disguised by pious political hyperbole and marketing misinformation. Moreover, militant commerce has an uncanny way of silencing spiritual reflection, along with the moral implications of industrial procedures. Yet in this sense, contemporary Youth is again proving far ahead of their strangely disconnected elders, since they remain alert to the observation that nothing is religiously neutral an age where complex agricultural techniques, coupled to ethical complacency, are effectively manufacturing a brand new branch of the Black Arts. Arguably then, from the legendary Dr. Faustus, to the fictional Victor Frankenstein, the same charge against modernity has echoed across the centuries. A warning voiced in Rabelais’ famous saying that “science without a conscience is the ruin of the soul”. This explains why some commentators can’t help feeling the ingenious Pythagorian himself would have been shocked at the depths to which people sink when science becomes a slave to corporate business ventures. Also, this may be why Monsanto’s representations to the media always seem to have a Faustian atmosphere about them. Time and again, the smell of sulphur chokes their official pronouncements. It is, therefore, unwise to ignore these historic meditations as “simply” subjective, while such a company openly wages a campaign to genetically modify our very food with apparently minimal public consent.

Sadly, vulnerable Third World countries appear to be the ecological “No Mans Land” between sustainable progress and almost demonic, global, manipulation; an example being easily discerned when considering Monsanto’s “Terminator” technology. Asking, of course, why any descent minded company would patent the genetic engineering of otherwise healthy plants to produce sterile seeds is unsettling enough. But the projection that this plan, if implemented, would reduce African and Indian farmers to a kind of credit dependency (whereby they are obliged to buy replacement seeds every year, rather than use existing stocks), is undeniably sinister. Clearly, those that unclean spirits would destroy, first they make servile. In addition to this death dealing research, pundits have pointed out that future environmental effects of genetically modified crops are, at present, unknown. Apart from steadily increasing evidence, which demonstrates that processes of cross pollination can actually spread herbicidal tolerance to wild plants in a manner similar to a virus. Long term, this means that instead of reducing the amount of chemicals applied in farming, some producers are becoming locked like junkies into chemical slavery, just to defend their perfectly natural crops. What else can be said, except that the striking hubris underlying these commercial decisions is staggering; a sin the spirits are ominously threatening to punish in this life.

Partly, the problem is caused by a global free-for-all to maximise profits for irresponsible shareholders, at the expense of Fertility and Freedom.. These transparently wicked designs are further linked to a weakening of our British borders as obvious defences against corporate insanity. Perhaps surprisingly, nationalist politics have proved to hold more substance than merely old-fashioned xenophobia, despite the calculated slanders mouthed by politicians associated with multinational business executives. Accompanied as these improprieties always are by a crippling lack of religious perspective concerning the environment from their side. In which case we, as practising spiritualists, need to be more mindful of forests and foliage as our ancestors in a way similar to those who have already passed into Spirit. We know, after all, our friends and family are now at one with the vast continuum. Furthermore, it can be said that our loved ones have joined with these archetypal energies in the sacred process of unending creation. Free of charge! Thus,only one question remains; will our Community awake to the challenge of defending Life, or continue to be side tracked by unadulterated trivia?

1 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

The aggressive campaign by the Monsanto demon is one side of a base metal coin. The other side of it is far more dangerous because it is the same demon wearing a caring smile on his face. His battle cry is 'sustainable development' and we are all in danger of being thoroughly taken in by his dark disciples. And they are legion. You can’t turn on the TV, listen to the radio, read a newspaper or surf the net without coming across this pernicious doctrine over and over and over again.

“Sustainable Development” - a comforting phrase. The suggestion is we can have it both ways: plenty of growth but all done in a benign and environmentally friendly way. Don’t be taken in. Sustainable Development has nothing to do with ecological sustainability. It has now been hijacked and come to mean something else. Multi-nationals use it as a mantra to urbanise the world, they employ PR companies to show they care and that they have our interest at heart. It works too. There are millions in the world who have been taken in and are working alongside the builders of “wealth” to cover the world in concrete, chop down trees, and fill the earth with chemicals and gases, so that pretty soon oxygen depletion will be so severe that we will have to pay to breathe. ‘Sustainable Development’ undermines the very concept of ecological sustainability. The lie is in the contradiction between the two words in the phrase. Something is either sustainable as it is or it can be developed, not both. Development means change and the death of that which was previously sustainable. Development means economic development and the expansion of human populations across the biosphere like a contagion. These people try to tell us that if we plan in a “sustainable” way, both the human population and the environment will benefit. This is untrue. The only thing that planning and consulting with multinationals and their drones (world governments) achieve is a greater seeming plausibility for the great con of sustainable devlopement. There is only so much land space and multinationals see it simply as surface on which to build to increase the population and have them as consumers of their products.

In Britain, since the middle ages, woodland across the UK has declined from about 70% to its current level of less than 10%. All over the developed and developing world, the story is the same. Kill the forests for human growth. Except it isn’t human. It is the work of dark forces whose ultimate aim is the destruction of humanity.

Climate change is a matter of fact and overdevelopment has been the cause and continues to be the cause of it. Overdevelopment and rising populations go hand in hand. What a mistake to keep on providing for overpopulation and overdevelopment. "Growth is good". What a tired old mantra. How backward looking. How twentieth century. Old thinking and old politicians can't get their heads around the fact that growth has to end. Degrowth is the answer.

Multinationals and politicians everywhere offer to build more houses, take up more land, screw up the environment with roads and sewage plants, airports, factories, shops, car parks, motorways and all the other nature unfriendly monuments to “civilisation”. Our politicians know that human spread and growth across the planet is unsustainable. They are all traitors to humanity.

“Growth is Good” - “Growth is Good” - “Growth is Good”. Won’t someone change the programme?

Let the gods help us all from the "Growth is good" brigade. Gaia is stirring. Her answer is climate change. As the human bacillus increases its spreads, she is entering into a state of hyperpyrexia to kill off the disease. If we wish to survive her wrath, then we need to rise up and challenge the Monsanto demon and all his cohorts.

1:05 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home